Sunday, March 31, 2013

Three Years On, States Still Struggle With Health Care Law Messaging

March 30, 2013

Listen to the Story 11 min 18 sec Playlist Download Transcript   Enlarge image i

Joy Reynolds of San Diego looks at the newspapers on display at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2012, following the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama's health care law.

David Goldman/AP

Joy Reynolds of San Diego looks at the newspapers on display at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2012, following the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama's health care law.

David Goldman/AP

It is hard to imagine that after three years of acrimony and debate we could still be so confused about President Obama's Affordable Care Act.

Is it actually possible Americans know less about Obamacare now than they did three years ago? Apparently that is the case, and the news comes just as the most sweeping effects of the law are about to kick in.

According to a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 80 percent of people don't know whether their state is going to expand Medicaid under the law, a huge piece of the health care changes coming down the pike.

“ People just don't have any idea about how they will be impacted.- Ron Cookston, Gateway to Care, Texas Half of people don't know whether their states are going to be setting up so-called health exchanges, and half of people think the law gives undocumented immigrants health care subsidies � it doesn't. The poll also shows that 40 percent of people still think the government is going to set up death panels to decide if someone gets heath care when they're dying � it won't. To further illustrate confusion about the law, 70 percent of people said they like the initiatives in the law when they were asked specifically about each one, but only 37 percent of people said they liked the law itself. Where Are We Now? NPR's health policy correspondent Julie Rovner says a lot of the confusion regarding the Affordable Care Act comes, in part, from a commanding "misinformation and disinformation" campaign. "It has worked better than the people who were trying to put the law into effect, who have been working to put the law into effect rather than messaging about it," Rovner tells weekends on All Things Considered guest host Laura Sullivan. There are essentially three big pieces to the Affordable Care Act: the insurance reforms (also known as the patients' bill of rights), quality and cost measures, and the health care mandate. The insurance reforms portion has mostly taken effect, Rovner says, and includes things like allowing adult children to stay on their parents' health insurance until they are 26, and not letting health plans cancel coverage after you get sick. These are things she says most polls show Americans back. The quality and cost measures are mostly behind-the-scenes changes that are meant to change the way health care is delivered to improve the care patients get to save money for both the patient and the government. The third part goes into effect on Jan. 1, and is the one that has caused the most controversy: the health care mandate. In an effort to get about 30 million more people health insurance, those who don't have coverage will pay a penalty. "This October is when small businesses and people without insurance can start enrolling in these so-called health exchanges," Rovner says. "That's where they'll be able to shop for health plans if they have moderate incomes [and] they'll be eligible for subsidies from the government to help pay for the plans." For low-income Americans who live in a state that has decided to accept the option to expand Medicaid, they can see if they qualify. As part of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act, it made the Medicaid expansion portion of the law optional. "So we're still waiting to see how many states take up the federal government's offer to pay for most of that cost," Rovner says. Despite the law's efforts to get all Americans health coverage, she says, some Americans could still fall through the cracks if their state doesn't take the option to expand Medicaid. The Risks Of Opting Out In order to get everyone health care coverage � whether a 22-year-old working in a coffee shop or a 58-year-old who's just been kicked off another insurance plan � the idea was that every state would create something called a health care exchange. This is a fancy way of saying each state would build a website and offer folks a sampler platter of low-cost insurance options. The law, however, gave states the chance to opt out of creating one. So far 26 states � mostly red states and mostly on ideological grounds � have done just that. It doesn't mean the exchanges aren't coming to those states or that people in those state's wont have to get insured, it simply means the federal government will build the exchange for those states. One of the states opting out of building its own health exchange is Texas. "Texas has the distinction of having the most uninsured people as a percentage of the population [than] any place in the country," says Ron Cookston, executive director of Gateway to Care, a nonprofit health care advocacy group in Houston. Almost 30 percent of adults in Texas lack health care insurance, according to the research company Gallup. Cookston and other advocates have to find a way to reach out to all those people and let them know what's coming.

"The state of Texas ... [has] great capabilities, and it would have been wonderful if since the passage of the Affordable Care Act they had begun to help communicate and inform our public so they would be ready," Cookston tells NPR's Sullivan. "People just don't have any idea about how they will be impacted."

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has been outspoken about his opposition to Obamacare, saying it costs too much and "kills too many jobs." Perry has also rejected Medicaid expansion in his state, which would have provided care to more than 1 million poor Texans.

President Obama says the federal government would pick up the tab, but Gov. Perry says he believes the state will be left with higher costs in the long run.

In Houston, where Cookston's group operates, few people who will be required to use the health care exchange know anything about it.

"When leadership in any state talks about things in a negative way, it becomes awfully easy for the general public to dismiss it and not think about it," he says.

The federal government is going to send organizations like Cookston's group some money to help get the word out, but he says what they're missing is a coordinating central body.

Related NPR Stories Shots - Health News At Age 3, Affordable Care Act Is No Less Controversial Shots - Health News Arkansas Medicaid Expansion Attracts Other States' Interest Shots - Health News Obamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's Claim Shots - Health News Ryan Budget Proposal Echoes Obamacare While Rejecting It

"The government of the state of Texas, they are not doing anything at this point in time," he says. "We certainly are, neighborhood by neighborhood ... because that's how this will have to be done � church by church, community by community. Unfortunately, we've not had the support of the [state]."

Spreading The Message

Unlike Texas, California has decided to build its own health exchange. The state has even gave it a catchy name, Covered California.

"[We're] doing consumer surveys, marketing and focus groups," says Peter Lee, who is running the state's health care effort. "So come this summer, we're going to hit the ground in a big way with messages that we know will resonate."

The state is hiring thousands of people to get Covered California off the ground, and the federal government is giving the state $900 million to do it. The "ground troops" needed to spread the message, Lee says, will come from the community.

"We'll be funding groups in communities across the state that are based in faith-based organizations, schools [and] unions," he says. "Because we know that delivering this message needs to come from your neighbor, from people in your community."

About 2.5 million Californians will be eligible for subsidies through Covered California, a diverse group of people, says Lee. He says the state needs to have outreach that speaks to farmers and people in rural communities, and in dozens of languages in downtown urban areas.

About half the states are following California's lead, setting up their own exchanges and using what is essentially seed money from Washington to get them off the ground.

"These are states that have said, 'Lets get this venture capitalist funding from the federal government to set up an exchange that works right for our state,' " Lee says.

For consumers, however, it doesn't matter if you're in Texas or California or anywhere else in the country, the law is clear: The uninsured are expected to get coverage by January. Whether those folks will be informed and ready by then is not so clear.

Share 18Facebook 8Twitter Email Comment More From Health Care Health CareThree Years On, States Still Struggle With Health Care Law MessagingHealth CareObamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's ClaimU.S.Pennsylvania Tightens Abortion Rules Following Clinic DeathsHealth CareEmployers Try To Spur Healthy Behaviors With Health Plan Rewards

More From Health Care

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Three Years On, States Still Struggle With Health Care Law Messaging

March 30, 2013

Listen to the Story 11 min 18 sec Playlist Download Transcript   Enlarge image i

Joy Reynolds of San Diego looks at the newspapers on display at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2012, following the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama's health care law.

David Goldman/AP

Joy Reynolds of San Diego looks at the newspapers on display at the Newseum in Washington, D.C., on June 29, 2012, following the Supreme Court ruling on President Obama's health care law.

David Goldman/AP

It is hard to imagine that after three years of acrimony and debate we could still be so confused about President Obama's Affordable Care Act.

Is it actually possible Americans know less about Obamacare now than they did three years ago? Apparently that is the case, and the news comes just as the most sweeping effects of the law are about to kick in.

According to a new poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation, 80 percent of people don't know whether their state is going to expand Medicaid under the law, a huge piece of the health care changes coming down the pike.

“ People just don't have any idea about how they will be impacted.- Ron Cookston, Gateway to Care, Texas Half of people don't know whether their states are going to be setting up so-called health exchanges, and half of people think the law gives undocumented immigrants health care subsidies � it doesn't. The poll also shows that 40 percent of people still think the government is going to set up death panels to decide if someone gets heath care when they're dying � it won't. To further illustrate confusion about the law, 70 percent of people said they like the initiatives in the law when they were asked specifically about each one, but only 37 percent of people said they liked the law itself. Where Are We Now? NPR's health policy correspondent Julie Rovner says a lot of the confusion regarding the Affordable Care Act comes, in part, from a commanding "misinformation and disinformation" campaign. "It has worked better than the people who were trying to put the law into effect, who have been working to put the law into effect rather than messaging about it," Rovner tells weekends on All Things Considered guest host Laura Sullivan. There are essentially three big pieces to the Affordable Care Act: the insurance reforms (also known as the patients' bill of rights), quality and cost measures, and the health care mandate. The insurance reforms portion has mostly taken effect, Rovner says, and includes things like allowing adult children to stay on their parents' health insurance until they are 26, and not letting health plans cancel coverage after you get sick. These are things she says most polls show Americans back. The quality and cost measures are mostly behind-the-scenes changes that are meant to change the way health care is delivered to improve the care patients get to save money for both the patient and the government. The third part goes into effect on Jan. 1, and is the one that has caused the most controversy: the health care mandate. In an effort to get about 30 million more people health insurance, those who don't have coverage will pay a penalty. "This October is when small businesses and people without insurance can start enrolling in these so-called health exchanges," Rovner says. "That's where they'll be able to shop for health plans if they have moderate incomes [and] they'll be eligible for subsidies from the government to help pay for the plans." For low-income Americans who live in a state that has decided to accept the option to expand Medicaid, they can see if they qualify. As part of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act, it made the Medicaid expansion portion of the law optional. "So we're still waiting to see how many states take up the federal government's offer to pay for most of that cost," Rovner says. Despite the law's efforts to get all Americans health coverage, she says, some Americans could still fall through the cracks if their state doesn't take the option to expand Medicaid. The Risks Of Opting Out In order to get everyone health care coverage � whether a 22-year-old working in a coffee shop or a 58-year-old who's just been kicked off another insurance plan � the idea was that every state would create something called a health care exchange. This is a fancy way of saying each state would build a website and offer folks a sampler platter of low-cost insurance options. The law, however, gave states the chance to opt out of creating one. So far 26 states � mostly red states and mostly on ideological grounds � have done just that. It doesn't mean the exchanges aren't coming to those states or that people in those state's wont have to get insured, it simply means the federal government will build the exchange for those states. One of the states opting out of building its own health exchange is Texas. "Texas has the distinction of having the most uninsured people as a percentage of the population [than] any place in the country," says Ron Cookston, executive director of Gateway to Care, a nonprofit health care advocacy group in Houston. Almost 30 percent of adults in Texas lack health care insurance, according to the research company Gallup. Cookston and other advocates have to find a way to reach out to all those people and let them know what's coming.

"The state of Texas ... [has] great capabilities, and it would have been wonderful if since the passage of the Affordable Care Act they had begun to help communicate and inform our public so they would be ready," Cookston tells NPR's Sullivan. "People just don't have any idea about how they will be impacted."

Texas Gov. Rick Perry has been outspoken about his opposition to Obamacare, saying it costs too much and "kills too many jobs." Perry has also rejected Medicaid expansion in his state, which would have provided care to more than 1 million poor Texans.

President Obama says the federal government would pick up the tab, but Gov. Perry says he believes the state will be left with higher costs in the long run.

In Houston, where Cookston's group operates, few people who will be required to use the health care exchange know anything about it.

"When leadership in any state talks about things in a negative way, it becomes awfully easy for the general public to dismiss it and not think about it," he says.

The federal government is going to send organizations like Cookston's group some money to help get the word out, but he says what they're missing is a coordinating central body.

Related NPR Stories Shots - Health News At Age 3, Affordable Care Act Is No Less Controversial Shots - Health News Arkansas Medicaid Expansion Attracts Other States' Interest Shots - Health News Obamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's Claim Shots - Health News Ryan Budget Proposal Echoes Obamacare While Rejecting It

"The government of the state of Texas, they are not doing anything at this point in time," he says. "We certainly are, neighborhood by neighborhood ... because that's how this will have to be done � church by church, community by community. Unfortunately, we've not had the support of the [state]."

Spreading The Message

Unlike Texas, California has decided to build its own health exchange. The state has even gave it a catchy name, Covered California.

"[We're] doing consumer surveys, marketing and focus groups," says Peter Lee, who is running the state's health care effort. "So come this summer, we're going to hit the ground in a big way with messages that we know will resonate."

The state is hiring thousands of people to get Covered California off the ground, and the federal government is giving the state $900 million to do it. The "ground troops" needed to spread the message, Lee says, will come from the community.

"We'll be funding groups in communities across the state that are based in faith-based organizations, schools [and] unions," he says. "Because we know that delivering this message needs to come from your neighbor, from people in your community."

About 2.5 million Californians will be eligible for subsidies through Covered California, a diverse group of people, says Lee. He says the state needs to have outreach that speaks to farmers and people in rural communities, and in dozens of languages in downtown urban areas.

About half the states are following California's lead, setting up their own exchanges and using what is essentially seed money from Washington to get them off the ground.

"These are states that have said, 'Lets get this venture capitalist funding from the federal government to set up an exchange that works right for our state,' " Lee says.

For consumers, however, it doesn't matter if you're in Texas or California or anywhere else in the country, the law is clear: The uninsured are expected to get coverage by January. Whether those folks will be informed and ready by then is not so clear.

Share 4Facebook 5Twitter Email Comment More From Health Care Health CareThree Years On, States Still Struggle With Health Care Law MessagingHealth CareObamacare Won't Affect Most 2012 Taxes, Despite Firm's ClaimU.S.Pennsylvania Tightens Abortion Rules Following Clinic DeathsHealth CareEmployers Try To Spur Healthy Behaviors With Health Plan Rewards

More From Health Care

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Health/PAC Bulletins Now Available Online

Searchable and free at www.healthpacbulletin.org.

From HealthPACBulletin.org –

Before there was an internet, with blogs, listservs and web pages to turn to, there was the Health/PAC Bulletin, the hard-hitting and muckraking journal of health activism and health care system analyses and critiques. A new web site, www.healthpacbulletin.org, is a complete and searchable digital collection of Health/PAC�s influential publication, which was published from 1968 through 1993. Health/PAC staffers and authors in New York City and briefly, a West Coast office in San Francisco, wrote and spoke to health activists across the country on every issue from free clinics to women�s health struggles to health worker organizing to environmental justice. Health/PAC both reported on what was going on and reflected back on a wide variety of strategies and tactics to build a more just health care system � a conversation that continues today.

Health/PAC coined the terms �medical empire� and �medical industrial complex� to capture the ways the profit motive distorted priorities in the American health care system. It critiqued big Pharma and rising health care costs, explored the differing forms of health activism, and made it clear that a seemingly disorganized health care system was in fact quite organized to serve ends other than health care. Its first book, The American Health Empire (1970), published by Random House, brought its analysis to national attention. Other edited collections of the Bulletins followed: Prognosis Negative (1976) and Beyond Crisis (1994). Many of today�s leading health activists, reformers and policy scholars got their start at Health/ PAC.

The website adds immeasurably to the resources documenting the history of mid- to late- 20th century American health policy and politics. Activists, scholars, journalists, practitioners, professors, and students will all find these Bulletins a sources of useful analysis and information.. This is not only a way to learn about the late 20th century history, but to consider why certain issues continue to plague our health system.

The site is a work in progress and we welcome your feedback and suggestions. It was a real labor to get these collected and available and we hope you find the site a useful resource.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Strike Debt Kicks Off Second Debt Buy-Up With March for Universal Healthcare

A coalition of groups associated with Occupy Wall Street took to the streets of midtown Manhattan on Thursday evening calling for the abolition of the for-profit health care system in the United States and the creation of a government-run single-payer system. Around 70 protesters marched to four major health insurance companies to list their grievances with each corporation, often by comparing what they see as the wildly disproportionate salaries of CEOs with health costs for regular patients or the company’s average worker’s salary.

The march was part of a larger project that Strike Debt (which formed from the creative churn of Occupy) is implementing over the week to draw attention to medical debt, which the group sees as a national emergency. Strike Debt also announced that its latest round of a project known as the Rolling Jubilee has bought and abolished over $1 million in medical debt.

Activists handed out fliers on the march with statistics on just how damaging medical debt can be to households: “62% of bankruptcies are linked to medical bills” was featured prominently on the flier, as well as on a banner at the front of the march. Also on the handout was perhaps an even more surprising number: “78% of those who declared medical bankruptcy had insurance at the time they became sick.”

Strike Debt’s mission is to politicize and organize around personal debt, often by arguing that debt is not a moral failing but rather a societal problem that needs to be addressed and resisted collectively. One of the tactics, called Rolling Jubilee, involves buying “debt for pennies on the dollar, but instead of collecting it, abolish[ing] it.” The group buys debt on the open market the same way a collection agency would, but cancels the debt instead of collecting it. Funding comes from donors who contribute to the group through its website.

The first Rolling Jubilee took place in November of last year and “abolished” more than $100,000 of medical debt. The People’s Bailout, as it was called on Twitter, culminated in a telethon at a New York City music venue and garnered unusually positive press for an Occupy-related action.

The second and latest Rolling Jubilee resulted in an even larger amount of debt abolished: over $1 million, according to a post on the group’s website, for patients in Kentucky and Indiana. “The average debtor owed around $900,” the group wrote, “and we will be abolishing the debt of over 1,000 people.” Strike Debt is in the process of sending out letters to patients whose debt has been bought and abolished, as it did following the first Rolling Jubilee.

One of the most common questions asked of Strike Debt is whether it can buy and cancel specific people’s debt. The answer is no. There are no strings attached for the person whose debt has been bought, though many activists hope that someone on the receiving end of the Rolling Jubilee might throw a few bucks back in the pot � a way of paying it forward, as it were.

Thursday’s action began at Bryant Park around 4 PM with activists opening a dozen shredded umbrellas bearing the insignias of insurance companies, such as Cigna and Aetna. The broken umbrellas represented the activists’ beliefs that even those who have private insurance are often not fully protected by it.

In contrast, the marchers also opened a dozen intact umbrellas with the words “Medicare for all” � another phrase for single-payer � painted on them.

A physician named David, part of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), addressed the crowd before the march. He railed against the high costs of medical care, lambasting the idea that the solution to the problem is complicated or somehow unknowable. “The answer is single-payer,” he said.

The protesters then marched to the offices of United Healthcare Group, Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, and Cigna, chanting “Health care for people, not for profit” and “Bankrupt and broke, insurance is a joke.” The flier that activists handed out on the march claims that “the combined annual compensation for the CEOs” of those four companies “could buy and abolish almost 2 billion dollars of medical debt using the rolling jubilee model.”

Katie Robbins, also with PNHP, said the “flimsy insurance [that] people get in case they get sick is a contract that gets broken all the time,” referring to the many people in the US who have insurance but nevertheless are forced to pay huge medical bills. She said that her deductible was so high that virtually any medical procedure would leave her thousands of dollars in debt. She also said that, by her calculations, having a baby could put her as much as $10,000 in debt, adding “that’s not a great place to be.”

Employers Try To Spur Healthy Behaviors With Health Plan Rewards

More From Shots - Health News HealthCatalog Of Gene Markers For Some Cancers Doubles In SizeHealthAllergy Drops Under The Tongue May Be Fine Alternative To ShotsHealth CareEmployers Try To Spur Healthy Behaviors With Health Plan RewardsHealthSequencing Of HeLa Genome Revives Genetic Privacy Concerns

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Saturday, March 23, 2013

Strike Debt Abolishes $1.1 Million of Medical Debt

Strike Debt, a group that emerged from the Occupy Wall Street movement, has planned a week of actions in multiple cities across the country to mark the abolition of $1.1 million in medical debt belonging to 1,064 people as part of the �Rolling Jubilee� project.

While that may already seem like a huge number, Strike Debt claims it�s only getting started and ultimately hopes to abolish around twenty times what they raised, which would be nearly $12 million.

�What we do is buy debt for pennies on the dollar,� Jacques, a member of Strike Debt, explained to activists gathered at Bryant Park on Thursday evening. �And instead of collecting on it like the debt collectors, we basically abolish it. We�re here today because we purchased over one million dollars of medical debt from over a thousand people in Kentucky and Indiana who had emergency room debt.� (A full report of the purchased debt can be found at the Rolling Jubilee�s transparency site.)

In order to kick off the �Life or Debt� week of action, protesters planned a medical bankruptcy tour to the various health insurance companies who Strike Debt sees as being exploitive of the sick and vulnerable by using insurance payments to fatten the wallets of the companies� CEOs instead of using that money for actual healthcare.

Paused before Aetna�s offices on Park Avenue, an activist announced to the group that Aetna�s CEO Mark Bertolini received over $10 million in total compensation last year, which is around 300 times the average worker�s pay.

A woman named Jamie spoke in front of Aetna�s office about how she wrote a letter to Bertolini after being denied coverage by the company due to a chronic work industry.

�I was frightened and heartbroken,� Jamie said. �I just couldn�t believe it. How could someone in charge of care turn their back on someone in unrelenting pain?�

Jamie�s letter was returned, unopened.

At the front of the procession, Strike Debt activists carried a banner that read �62% of all bankruptcies are due to medical debt.�

Another activist carried a sign: �Medical bills: death by spreadsheet.�

In front of the insurance giant CIGNA, a protester recounted the death of 17-year-old Natalie Sarkisyan, who died after having her liver transplant surgery first denied and then later delayed by the company.

In 2007, Natalie�s mother addressed a crowd of supporters in front of CIGNA�s Philadelphia headquarters.

�CIGNA killed my daughter,� Nataline�s mother Hilda told security. �I want an apology.� Sarkisyan was not able to speak to [CIGNA CEO] Hanway; a communications specialist talked to her instead. After their conversation, employees heckled the group from a balcony; one man gave them the finger. CIGNA called the police and had the family and their friends escorted from the building.
A CIGNA executive later apologized for the incident in a letter about a month later.

Over the weekend, Strike Debt activists have planned a free health fair and march to highlight hospital closings. The march will feature sites like the closed St. Vincent�s community hospital, which will enjoy a �second life� as the site of luxury condos priced between $1.4 and $8.2 million. The tour will be followed by free legal advice and health care at Judson Church. On Saturday, practitioners will also be on call to answer medical questions at Strike Debt�s website.

�These debts are literally killing patients, students, providers and communities,� the group states at its website. �They deepen the already entrenched inequalities that divide races, classes, and genders. Our healthcare system doesn�t make us well; it prolongs our illnesses in the name of profit.�

Health Insurers Warn on Premiums

From the Wall St. Journal –

Health insurers are privately warning brokers that premiums for many individuals and small businesses could increase sharply next year because of the health-care overhaul law, with the nation’s biggest firm projecting that rates could more than double for some consumers buying their own plans.

The projections, made in sessions with brokers and agents, provide some of the most concrete evidence yet of how much insurance companies might increase prices when major provisions of the law kick in next year�a subject of rigorous debate.

The projected increases are at odds with what the Obama Administration says consumers should be expecting overall in terms of cost. The Department of Health and Human Services says that the law will “make health-care coverage more affordable and accessible,” pointing to a 2009 analysis by the Congressional Budget Office that says average individual premiums, on an apples-to-apples basis, would be lower.

The gulf between the pricing talk from some insurers and the government projections suggests how complicated the law’s effects will be. Carriers will be filing proposed prices with regulators over the next few months.

Part of the murkiness stems from the role of government subsidies. Federal subsidies under the health law will help lower-income consumers defray costs, but they are generally not included in insurers’ premium projections. Many consumers will be getting more generous plans because of new requirements in the law. The effects of the law will vary widely, and insurers and other analysts agree that some consumers and small businesses will likely see premiums go down.

Starting next year, the law will block insurers from refusing to sell coverage or setting premiums based on people’s health histories, and will reduce their ability to set rates based on age. That can raise coverage prices for younger, healthier consumers, while reining them in for older, sicker ones. The rules can also affect small businesses, which sometimes pay premiums tied to employees’ health status and claims history.

Continue reading…

Friday, March 22, 2013

Colorado Doctors Treating Gunshot Victims Differ On Gun Politics

More From Shots - Health News HealthDoubts Raised About Cutting Medicare Pay In High-Spending AreasHealthTalk Globally, Go Locally: Cellphones Vs. Clean ToiletsHealthHow A Sleep Disorder Might Point To A Forgotten FutureHealthTuberculosis Cases In The U.S. Keep Sliding

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Friday, March 15, 2013

One Million More Young Adults Have Coverage Thanks to Health Law

Last week we all got some great news when the Census Bureau released data showing that 500,000 more young adults in 2010 gained health coverage thanks to a provision of the Affordable Care Act that allows young adults to stay on their parents� plans until they turn 26.�

Today, we got new data and even better news � the number of young adults with health coverage has climbed even higher.

A new report shows that as of March 31, 2011, approximately one million more young adults have coverage, compared with one year ago.

The CDC�s National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) shows that in the first quarter of 2011, the percentage of adults between the ages of 19 and 25 with health insurance increased to 69.6%, from 66.1% in 2010. This amounts to 1 million more young adults with insurance than last year, because of the health law signed by President Obama. The Census Bureau�s results only included data through the end of 2010. The report released from the CDC today includes data from a portion of 2011.

These data are one more sign that the Affordable Care Act is working - especially for young adults all across the country. We know young adults are the group least likely to have health insurance and while most are in great health, everyone needs insurance in case they experience an injury or illness.

The data released today is also consistent with reports from a newly released Gallup survey which found that the Affordable Care Act has been successful at covering young adults in the first part of 2011.� Gallup wrote:

�The provision of the Affordable Care Act that allows children up to the age of 26 to remain on their parents' plans appears to be having an immediate effect on the number of Americans who report they have health insurance.�

These three national surveys show a consistent pattern: more young adults are getting the health insurance they need. of expanded health coverage for young people. This expansion of health coverage sets the tone as we move towards 2014, when more Americans than ever will have access to affordable insurance options.

To read more about the data release today, please visit this page.

Health Care and Profits, a Poor Mix

Thirty years ago, Bonnie Svarstad and Chester Bond of the School of Pharmacy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison discovered an interesting pattern in the use of sedatives at nursing homes in the south of the state.

Patients entering church-affiliated nonprofit homes were prescribed drugs roughly as often as those entering profit-making �proprietary� institutions. But patients in proprietary homes received, on average, more than four times the dose of patients at nonprofits.

Writing about his colleagues� research in his 1988 book �The Nonprofit Economy,� the economist Burton Weisbrod provided a straightforward explanation: �differences in the pursuit of profit.� Sedatives are cheap, Mr. Weisbrod noted. �Less expensive than, say, giving special attention to more active patients who need to be kept busy.�

This behavior was hardly surprising. Hospitals run for profit are also less likely than nonprofit and government-run institutions to offer services like home health care and psychiatric emergency care, which are not as profitable as open-heart surgery.

A shareholder might even applaud the creativity with which profit-seeking institutions go about seeking profit. But the consequences of this pursuit might not be so great for other stakeholders in the system � patients, for instance. One study found that patients� mortality rates spiked when nonprofit hospitals switched to become profit-making, and their staff levels declined.

These profit-maximizing tactics point to a troubling conflict of interest that goes beyond the private delivery of health care. They raise a broader, more important question: How much should we rely on the private sector to satisfy broad social needs?

From health to pensions to education, the United States relies on private enterprise more than pretty much every other advanced, industrial nation to provide essential social services. The government pays Medicare Advantage plans to deliver health care to aging Americans. It provides a tax break to encourage employers to cover workers under 65.

Businesses devote almost 6 percent of the nation�s economic output to pay for health insurance for their employees. This amounts to nine times similar private spending on health benefits across the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, on average. Private plans cover more than a third of pension benefits. The average for 30 countries in the O.E.C.D. is just over one-fifth.

We let the private sector handle tasks other countries would never dream of moving outside the government�s purview. Consider bail bondsmen and their rugged sidekicks, the bounty hunters.

American TV audiences may reminisce fondly about Lee Majors in �The Fall Guy� chasing bad guys in a souped-up GMC truck � a cheap way to get felons to court. People in most other nations see them as an undue commercial intrusion into the criminal justice system that discriminates against the poor.

Our reliance on private enterprise to provide the most essential services stems, in part, from a more narrow understanding of our collective responsibility to provide social goods. Private American health care has stood out for decades among industrial nations, where public universal coverage has long been considered a right of citizenship. But our faith in private solutions also draws on an ingrained belief that big government serves too many disparate objectives and must cater to too many conflicting interests to deliver services fairly and effectively.

Our trust appears undeserved, however. Our track record suggests that handing over responsibility for social goals to private enterprise is providing us with social goods of lower quality, distributed more inequitably and at a higher cost than if government delivered or paid for them directly.

The government�s most expensive housing support program � it will cost about $140 billion this year � is a tax break for individuals to buy homes on the private market.

According to the Tax Policy Center, this break will benefit only 20 percent of mostly well-to-do taxpayers, and most economists agree that it does nothing to further its purported goal of increasing homeownership. Tax breaks for private pensions also mostly benefit the wealthy. And 401(k) plans are riskier and costlier to administer than Social Security.

From the high administrative costs incurred by health insurers to screen out sick patients to the array of expensive treatments prescribed by doctors who earn more money for every treatment they provide, our private health care industry provides perhaps the clearest illustration of how the profit motive can send incentives astray.

By many objective measures, the mostly private American system delivers worse value for money than every other in the developed world. We spend nearly 18 percent of the nation�s economic output on health care and still manage to leave tens of millions of Americans without adequate access to care.

Britain gets universal coverage for 10 percent of gross domestic product. Germany and France for 12 percent. What�s more, our free market for health services produces no better health than the public health care systems in other advanced nations. On some measures � infant mortality, for instance � it does much worse.

In a way, private delivery of health care misleads Americans about the financial burdens they must bear to lead an adequate existence. If they were to consider the additional private spending on health care as a form of tax � an indispensable cost to live a healthy life � the nation�s tax bill would rise to about 31 percent from 25 percent of the nation�s G.D.P. � much closer to the 34 percent average across the O.E.C.D.

A quarter of a century ago, a belief swept across America that we could reduce the ballooning costs of the government�s health care entitlements just by handing over their management to the private sector. Private companies would have a strong incentive to identify and wipe out wasteful treatment. They could encourage healthy lifestyles among beneficiaries, lowering use of costly care. Competition for government contracts would keep the overall price down.

We now know this didn�t work as advertised. Competition wasn�t as robust as hoped. Health maintenance organizations didn�t keep costs in check, and they spent heavily on administration and screening to enroll only the healthiest, most profitable beneficiaries.

One study of Medicare spending found that the program saved no money by relying on H.M.O.�s. Another found that moving Medicaid recipients into H.M.O.�s increased the average cost per beneficiary by 12 percent with no improvement in the quality of care for the poor. Two years ago, President Obama�s health care law cut almost $150 billion from Medicare simply by reducing payments to private plans that provide similar care to plain vanilla Medicare at a higher cost.

Today, again, entitlements are at the center of the national debate. Our elected officials are consumed by slashing a budget deficit that is expected to balloon over coming decades. With both Democrats and Republicans unwilling to raise taxes on the middle class, the discussion is quickly boiling down to how deeply entitlements must be cut.

We may want to broaden the debate. The relevant question is how best we can serve our social needs at the lowest possible cost. One answer is that we have a lot of room to do better. Improving the delivery of social services like health care and pensions may be possible without increasing the burden on American families, simply by removing the profit motive from the equation.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Health Care Reform: We’re Not Done Yet

The Supreme Court has spoken. The Affordable Care Act, briefly on the ropes, has been blessed as the law of the land.

Too many feel that health reform is finally finished and we can move on to the big three issues: the economy, jobs and the deficit. However, because health care is the 800-pound gorilla of the economy, those issues cannot be solved without more far-reaching health reform.

Sorry, lawmakers, but you are going to need to get back in the ring to answer a fundamental question: what is the most cost-effective and constitutional way to finance health care so that we can have quality, affordable health care for everyone?

The answer � single-payer national health insurance, also known as an improved Medicare for all � would save America hundreds of billions of dollars annually. And as the Supreme Court reaffirmed, a program of this type, financed by taxes, is definitely constitutional.

Outrageously, this simple solution was never discussed in the two contentious years of debate surrounding the creation of the ACA because it was deemed �politically impossible.�

�Politically impossible� means that the mere utterance of �single payer� would be enough to prompt the medical-industrial complex, especially the pharmaceutical and insurance industries, to funnel millions of dollars in campaign contributions and lobbying money to opponents of real reform and to tea party groups in order to keep the status quo.

So America continues to promote the least cost-effective way of financing health care, which means that we spend twice per capita on health care than any other nation on earth.

When we were the global leader as we were back in the mid-20th century, we could afford to do this. However, we cannot afford our health care system anymore. It is hopelessly complex, bureaucratic, and outrageously expensive. Employers have shifted the cost to employees and it will only get worse as private insurers raise their premiums.

Beyond skyrocketing premiums, about 18 percent of our gross national product is consumed by health care. That figure will rise to 20 percent by the end of the decade. In order to fund this inefficient system, we have borrowed trillions of dollars over the past 50 years, transforming us into the world�s greatest debtor nation.

No matter who wins the November election, the next administration will be forced to confront the deficit. Unfortunately, it appears that our lawmakers� tunnel vision only offers slashing Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare for the poor and elderly as a way to reduce government spending. That course would be catastrophic.

No one seems to want to confront the fact that unless we are willing to embrace an improved Medicare for all, with its streamlined administration and bargaining clout, we have no hope of controlling health care costs, ensuring that our country will remain in debt. Had we adopted a single-payer system 20 years ago, we would have turned our national debt into a surplus today.

In a global economy, employers have to add the cost of health insurance to every product or service. When that cost is twice what the world spends, it eventually means that we are pricing our products too high. Manufacturers have moved their major factories overseas because of lower labor costs, of which health insurance is a key component.

Entrepreneurs are everywhere in America, but too many are locked into undesirable jobs because they need the health benefits. Those who want to put their toe into the self-employed world stop because of the risk of losing health benefits which is bad for an economy that needs creativity and risk.

State and local governments are being weighed down by pension obligations and retiree health benefits. Under a single-payer system, Philadelphia could be freed from the unpredictability of these costs and use those precious dollars for our schools, streets, or public safety.

An ABC/Washington Post poll shows that less than 40 percent of Americans view the ACA or the status quo favorably � remarkably low for a �uniquely American� solution.

Our politics have robbed us from even discussing a practical, commonsense solution � improved Medicare for all — that we desperately need in America. If the medical-industrial complex continues to win, health care costs will continue to rise, and the American people will be the losers.

Dr. Walter Tsou is former health commissioner of Philadelphia. He is a board adviser to Physicians for a National Health Program (www.pnhp.org) and resides in Philadelphia.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Obama and Daschle should opt for single-payer

Barack Obama needs to make good on his campaign pledge to reform health care. It is not enough to throw the issue off to former Senator Tom Daschle, Obama�s choice to head the Department of Health and Human Services.

Daschle says he wants to hear from us, the American people, on this issue. So we should oblige him.

Obama and Daschle have a choice: Rely on a private insurance-based plan that does little to mitigate the escalating health care crisis, or solve the problem once and for all and adopt universal, single-payer health care.

Many in Congress, the media, conservative think tanks and some advocacy groups � led by the Service Employees International Union and its business allies � are stumping for piecemeal changes.

Such a path would perpetuate the crisis and deal a cruel blow to the hopes of Americans for real reform. Those in Congress and liberal policy organizations who are embracing caution or promoting more insurance, not more care, are playing a risky game. It could jeopardize the health security of tens of millions of Americans and, in the process, fatally erode public support for the Obama administration.

Hardly a day passes without fresh signs of the health-care implosion.

Just days after the election, the New York Times reported a sharp increase in cost-shifting in employer-paid health plans, with more employers pushing high deductible plans that typically cost workers thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket payments.

Similarly, the Wall Street Journal reported a huge spike in health care premiums for small businesses, which prompted many to raise deductibles or cut coverage.

The consequences are chillingly apparent. In October, the Washington Post cited a study that found one-fourth of Americans are skipping doctors� visits, and 10 percent could not take their child to the doctor because of cost.

That same month, USA Today reported that one in eight patients with advanced cancer turn down recommended treatment because of the bills.

America is falling embarrassingly behind.

A study by the Commonwealth Fund in November compared adults with chronic conditions, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, or heart disease, in seven major industrialized countries. A stunning 54 percent of the American respondents said they were likely to go without recommended care, compared to just 7 percent of chronically ill patients in the Netherlands. Over 40 percent of the Americans spent more than $1,000 on medical bills, compared to just 4 percent of British and 5 percent of French patients.

If we adopted a universal, single-payer system like these European countries, or if we simply expanded Medicare to all Americans, we would rectify this problem.

The need is urgent. Today 46 million Americans are without health care.

Millions more are at risk of losing it during this recession. And huge numbers of Americans with insurance can�t afford the cost hikes.

At some point, our government must stop subsidizing these private companies and start investing in the American people.

The time to do so is now.

The best way to get it done is to guarantee all Americans health care in a single-payer system.

Tell Obama and Daschle to support improved Medicare for all.

Rose Ann DeMoro is executive director of the 85,000-member California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee.

This article is from the Progressive.

Affordable Care Act is Working to Bring Down Health Care Costs

Before the Affordable Care Act passed, the dramatic rise in health care costs put access to health care coverage out of reach for many Americans. With many people no longer able to afford coverage, the cost of uncompensated care in hospitals rose and those costs were passed along to people that could afford coverage. And, at the same time, health care�s share of the nation�s economy was growing rapidly.�

Three years later, the Affordable Care Act is working to bring down health care costs.

The law includes innovative tools to drive down health care costs.� It incentivizes efficient care, supports a robust health information technology infrastructure, and fights fraud and waste. ��After decades of growing faster than the economy, last year, Medicare costs grew by only four-tenths of a percent per person, continuing the trend of historically low Medicare growth seen in 2011 and 2010.

Major progress in Medicare is sparking smarter care in the private market, and it�s working to bring down costs in the private market. Overall health-care costs grew more slowly than the rest of the economy in 2011 for the first time in more than a decade. And just last week, USA Today reported health care providers and analysts found that �cost-saving measures under the health care law appear to be keeping medical prices flat.�

Even though the health care law is working to bring down costs, critics continue to claim the law is too expensive.� In reality, the law is fully paid for, and according to the independent Congressional Budget Office, the law reduces the deficit over the long term.� The facts show that employers, patients and our federal budget can�t afford to roll back the law now:

Fully repealing the Affordable Care Act would increase the deficit by $100 billion over ten years and more than a trillion dollars in the next decade.� It would also shorten the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by eight years.Health care spending grew by 3.9 percent in 2011, continuing for the third consecutive year the slowest growth rate in fifty years.Health-care costs grew slower than the rest of the economy in 2011 for the first time in more than a decade.The proportion of requests for double-digit premium increases plummeted from 75 percent in 2010 to 14 percent so far in 2013.Medicaid spending per beneficiary decreased by 1.9 percent from 2011 to 2012.Medicare spending per beneficiary grew by only 0.4 in fiscal year 2012.Slower growth is projected to reduce Medicare and Medicaid expenditures by 15 percent or $200 billion by 2020 compared to what those programs would have spent without this slowdown, according to CBO.

At the same time the law is driving down cost growth, the Affordable Care Act is strengthening coverage and expanding coverage.� Thanks to the law, more than 34 million people with Medicare received a no-cost preventive service.� And, over six million Medicare beneficiaries received $5.7 billion in prescription drug discounts.�

Some have proposed turning Medicare into a voucher program--undercutting the guaranteed benefits that seniors have earned and forcing them to pay thousands more out of their own pockets.� If we turn Medicare into a voucher program, our system doesn�t have any incentives to be more efficient and lower costs.� Instead, as costs rise, vouchers will leave seniors to pay more and more out of their own pocket. �

The health care law is working to lower costs, increase efficiency, and deliver better patient outcomes � without cutting costs at seniors� expense.� In recent years, we have seen dramatic slowing of the growth of federal health care programs.� The best approach to reducing our deficit is to continue implementing common-sense reforms.� The health care law is putting us on the right path to make Medicare and Medicaid stronger, more efficient and less costly.�

Monday, March 11, 2013

Health-care fight hits city streets

It had been a busy morning for Indiana health-care activists. Several folks associated with Hoosiers for a Commonsense Health Care Plan had purchased WellPoint stock in order to gain the forum of the annual stockholders meeting, where they told the Indiana-based company leadership that for-profit health insurance companies are the biggest barrier to desperately needed reform.

Then, about 150 people carrying signs supporting H.R. 676, the bill that would expand Medicare to cover all, held a rally on the north steps of Monument Circle.

The rally closed with the group, many of whom were wearing t-shirts quoting the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. (“Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane”), noisily marching past WellPoint’s headquarters to the Indianapolis offices of Sen. Evan Bayh.

It had recently been reported that Bayh’s wife Susan received $327,000 in compensation in 2008 for her role as a director of WellPoint. “Senator Bayh says he’s agnostic about health-care reform,” rally coordinator Julia Vaughn told the crowd, quoting the senator’s recent vapid statement to Fox News. “Let’s help him get religion, folks!”

One of the Hoosiers chanting “People, Not Profits” on the sidewalk in front of Bayh’s office was 90-year-old Harold Taylor, an Episcopal priest from Bloomington. A young man approached Taylor, bent down slightly to the level of Taylor’s wheelchair, and asked him to sign a petition supporting health-care reform. As Taylor accepted the pen, one of his companions said, “Hey, wait a minute. That petition is not for single payer; it is for Obama’s plan.”

Taylor’s eyes flashed anger and he shoved the clipboard back at the young man, petition unsigned. “I am a supporter of Obama’s, but I am ashamed of that, and you should be, too,” he said.

The exchange was revealing. On the most pressing domestic issue of our time, the candidate who promised change has become a president who has not yet strayed far from the status quo.

At the rally, Bloomington emergency room physician Rob Stone had cited Obama’s historic November victory as proof of the power of grassroots activism. “But on health-care reform,” Stone told the crowd, “we can’t sit back and say, ‘President Obama is a good guy, and he will take care of it.’ We are going to have to find our voice and speak up.”

The good Dr. Stone has the right prescription. With health insurance premiums doubling in the past nine years, Americans now spend more on health care than we do on housing or food — in large part because of the cut taken by middlemen like WellPoint.

We all know dozens of people who feel the pain. Hoosier families declare bankruptcy due to medical bills their insurance won’t cover, small business owners struggle to afford health care for themselves, much less their employees, and our neighbors with disabilities suffer without needed medicine and care.

When those folks start joining the crowds at WellPoint’s and Sen. Bayh’s doorsteps, they will bring real change with them.

Businesses Sue Government Over Birth Control Mandate

More From Shots - Health News HealthFlu Risk And Weather: It's Not The Heat, It's The HumidityHealthCould A 'Brain Pacemaker' Someday Treat Severe Anorexia?HealthA Man's Journey From Nepal To Texas Triggers Global TB ScrambleHealthShrimp Trawling Comes With Big Risks

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Like The U.S., Europe Wrestles With Health Care

More From Shots - Health News HealthFlu Risk And Weather: It's Not The Heat, It's The HumidityHealthCould A 'Brain Pacemaker' Someday Treat Severe Anorexia?HealthA Man's Journey From Nepal To Texas Triggers Global TB ScrambleHealthShrimp Trawling Comes With Big Risks

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Are Democrats Reaching On Latest 'War On Women' Claim?

More From Shots - Health News HealthFlu Risk And Weather: It's Not The Heat, It's The HumidityHealthCould A 'Brain Pacemaker' Someday Treat Severe Anorexia?HealthA Man's Journey From Nepal To Texas Triggers Global TB ScrambleHealthShrimp Trawling Comes With Big Risks

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Health Think Tank Crunches Health Prices For The Masses

More From Shots - Health News HealthFlu Risk And Weather: It's Not The Heat, It's The HumidityHealthCould A 'Brain Pacemaker' Someday Treat Severe Anorexia?HealthA Man's Journey From Nepal To Texas Triggers Global TB ScrambleHealthShrimp Trawling Comes With Big Risks

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be signed in to leave a comment. Sign In / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

What People are Saying: Promoting Coordinated Health Care

Yesterday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced final rules for a new program designed to encourage primary care doctors, specialists, hospitals, and other health care providers to coordinate their care.� Created by the Affordable Care Act, these rules on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) add to the menu of options for providers looking to better coordinate care for patients and will make it easier for providers to deliver high quality care and use health care dollars more wisely.

These rules followed months of comment and soliciting feedback from stakeholders across the health care industry.� Here�s what people are saying about the new rules:

AARP: "The programs announced today can benefit people in Medicare by encouraging providers to work together to better coordinate patient care"

American Medical Association: "We are pleased that the final rule on Medicare Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) includes many of the important changes recommended by the AMA to allow all interested physicians to lead and participate in these new models of care."

American Hospital Association: "We believe today�s menu of ACO options allows America�s hospitals to create new models of accountable care organizations on which the transformation of health care delivery is so dependent."

Association of American Medical Colleges: "Medical schools and teaching hospitals� institutions that often treat the sickest and most vulnerable patients�have a better opportunity to participate in the ACO initiative."

American Medical Group Association: �CMS has listened to what other people said and proposed a different approach�I�m hoping lots of ACOs form because of the potential this model has for transforming our health system for the better.�

National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems: "By listening and responding to provider concerns, the administration has taken positive steps toward developing a program that will provide more integrated care to patients in a framework feasible for providers... These changes will allow hospitals and other providers to more easily participate in the program, and should add to the success of this initiative and future innovations in health care delivery system reform."

Campaign For Better Care: �As advocates for consumers, particularly for our oldest and sickest patients who urgently need better-coordinated care, we applaud this effort to incentivize better primary care, increase coordination, and share accountability across providers. We are very pleased that this final rule will require ACOs to adhere to strong patient-centered criteria, use beneficiary experience of care measures to evaluate performance, and ensure full transparency, notification and choice for beneficiaries.�

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Better Medicare Products and Services at Lower Cost

For years, spiraling Medicare costs have threatened Medicare beneficiaries and their providers.� And turning to the competitive marketplace seemed to offer little respite. Until now.

On January 1, 2011, the first phase of the competitive bidding program was successfully implemented for nine product categories in nine areas of the country. This means that suppliers of certain medical supplies, such as oxygen equipment, walkers, and some types of power wheelchairs compete among each other to determine the price Medicare will pay for their services to seniors. This in turn sets new, lower payment rates for these pieces of medical equipment and supplies.

Building on that success, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today announced that they are expanding the competitive bidding program to additional areas of the country and also expanding the list of items included in the first round of bidding. All of the product categories selected for Round Two are high cost, high volume items with large savings potential.

This program reduces Medicare spending and beneficiary cost-sharing, and it forces winners of these contracts to compete on quality and customer service. Ultimately, beneficiaries get better products and services, while paying less out of their own pocket. In fact, the Medicare actuary estimates that this program will save more than $28 billion over the first ten years of the program. The $28 billion savings comes from a combination of savings of more than $17 billion in Medicare expenditures, and savings of over $11 billion for beneficiaries as a result of lower coinsurance payments and the downward effect on monthly premium payments. .

For more information about the Medicare DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Program, please visit CMS� Newsroom or go to �www.medicare.gov/supplier.

Monday, March 4, 2013

Medicare for all CA Bus tour: In West Covina Tonight SiCKO ‘Sisters’ Reunite

What: SiCKO Reunion on final summer 2012 Medicare for all bus tour in California
When: Thursday, July 12 � health screenings 3-6 pm, and town hall at 6:30 pm
Where: West Covina City Hall, 1444 W Garvey Ave

Today in West Covina, the California Nurses Association summer 2012 Medicare for all bus tour will come to a close. After visiting 18 other California cities since June 19, the nurses will wrap up this run with a bang and with clarity. Three of the subjects of Michael Moore�s 2007 documentary film SiCKO will be on hand to help lead others in sharing their stories of struggle and frustration with the broken healthcare system.

The American SiCKOs reunited in Philadelphia in June. Pictured are Anne Moore, Molly Hardesty-Moore, Reggie Cervantes, Dawnelle Keys, Julie Pierce, Tracy Pierce, Jr., Michael Moore, Adrian Campbell-Montgomery, Eric Weinrib, Larry and Donna Smith, Lee Einer.

9/11 first responder Reggie Cervantes and Dawnelle Keys, the mother whose toddler died because she was denied treatment at an out-of-network hospital, will join me at this final stop where the nurses will perform health screenings from 3 � 6 p.m. and then we�ll have a town hall meeting from 6:30 � 8 p.m. My husband and I lost everything we had worked a lifetime to achieve when we got sick even though we always carried health insurance.

Five years ago, when SiCKO was released, the nurses of CNA went to Sacramento with Michael Moore to call attention to the pain Californians were needlessly suffering at the hands of the dysfunctional system. On this fifth anniversary of the film�s release, this West Covina reunion of some of the American SICKOs will help highlight how far we have yet to go and what these women have to say about the current healthcare law � the Affordable Care Act � just upheld by the Supreme Court and the subject of so much political gamesmanship. These SiCKO patients will share what it means to real people, real Californians. And that�s what this tour has been all about.

Don�t come planning to sit unengaged through a lengthy program. Come ready to become a part of what moves California and the nation to a place where there are no more SiCKOs like me or Reggie or Dawnelle. See you in West Covina. And don�t think because this tour is almost a wrap that the nurses are finished. They won�t be done until every patient is treated under a system that includes a single standard of high quality care for all � a guaranteed, improved Medicare for all system.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Celebrating National Health Center Week in Philly

During National Health Center Week, representatives from the Department of Health and Human Services traveled around the country to attend events honoring the great work that Community Health Centers do day in and day out.

I traveled to Philadelphia to participate in the 4th Annual National Health Center Week Celebration hosted by the City of Philadelphia and the Health Federation of Philadelphia in the regal Mayor's reception room. There was an impressive turnout in spite of a torrential rainstorm, which is a testament to how much the community values and appreciates the health centers. A special part of the program was the Youth Poster Contest Award Ceremony. I am surrounded by the winning submissions by the young artists, the topic of which is "Community Health Centers: Health Care for All." It was an honor to be recognized by my friend State Senator Vince Hughes who is fortunate to represent several students who created the winning entries. Senator Hughes made a great point in recognizing the combination of the creation of great art and community service.�

HHS Regional Director Joanne Grossi (center) listens as Spectrum Health�Services� Phyllis Carter (at podium) praises student artists for their work�in creating posters depicting the value of community health centers while�U.S. Representative Chaka Fattah (left) looks on.

I was pleased to point out the impressive number of people who benefit from community health centers and how the ACA helped to make that happen. I was also honored to announce that two organizations in Philadelphia were receiving a total of $540,000 for new access points. The highlight of the event occurred when Congressman Chaka Fattah offered his perspective on the value of community health centers and pledged his unwavering support for the Affordable Care Act. Congressman Fattah related his conversations with President Obama on their shared commitment to health care for all. The program culminated with Deputy Mayor Dr. Donald Schwarz doing an excellent job as awards presenter and ensuring the young artists received the recognition they deserved for their poignant works of art, which reminded us all of how community health centers continue to improve and save lives every day.

Morning-After Pills Don't Cause Abortion, Studies Say

More From Shots - Health News HealthHealth Insurers Brace For Consumer Ratings In Some StatesHealthA Mother's Death Tested Reporter's Thinking About End-Of-Life CareHealthSacrificing Sleep Makes For Run-Down Teens � And ParentsHealthChange In Law May Spur Campus Action On Sexual Assaults

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Freeing Doctors to Focus on Patients, Not Paperwork

Did you know your doctor has to spend 12 cents of every dollar she makes to hire staff just to fill out insurance forms and other paperwork?� Wouldn�t you rather she spend that time with you?

Today, the Department of Health and Human Services issued rules to simplify the mounds of paperwork that doctors, nurses, and other caregivers have to complete in order to get paid for treating you. We estimate that these changes will save our health care system $12 billion over the next 10 years.� More important, it will free caregivers to spend more time with you. We estimate these changes will give doctors back four hours a week and another five hours to their staff.

This common-sense streamlining means fewer phone calls between physicians and health plans, lower postage and paperwork cots, and fewer denied claims.� All in all, this means physicians can cut through the red tape and spend more time and money administering quality care to their patients.

Under these rules, called for by the Affordable Care Act, doctors and other health care professionals will be able to use a simple, streamlined form to ask your insurance company if you are eligible for benefits.� And a second form will be used for doctors� offices to check to the status of insurance claims they have filed. And insurers have agreed to accept these forms rather than use multiple systems.

This is only the beginning of our efforts to cut out waste and inefficiency in our health care system and free dedicated doctors, nurses, and caregivers to focus their time and efforts on keeping patients healthy, treating illness, and restoring health.� Stay tuned.

Friday, March 1, 2013

Health Insurers Brace For Consumer Ratings In Some States

More From Shots - Health News HealthHealth Insurers Brace For Consumer Ratings In Some StatesHealthA Mother's Death Tested Reporter's Thinking About End-Of-Life CareHealthSacrificing Sleep Makes For Run-Down Teens � And ParentsHealthChange In Law May Spur Campus Action On Sexual Assaults

More From Shots - Health News

Comments   You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login / Register

Please keep your community civil. All comments must follow the NPR.org Community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated prior to posting. NPR reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part, and to use the commenter's name and location, in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

Please enable Javascript to view the comments powered by Disqus.